Speaker summary
71% 1 analyzed article/video 62.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Louise results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Halo Effect , and Indoctrination , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 78.4% saturation with 56.863 hits . Analysis detected 202.863 faulty-reasoning hits from 62.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 25.7% and a BS Rank of 42% (16,555 of 28,364 speakers). This Louise is better (less manipulative) than 58.40% of the peer group. Louise
Speaker details
Total words: 62.667
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
42% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 41.6% percentile 25.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos62.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 78.4% 78.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 60.5% 60.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 25.5% 25.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 25.5% 25.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 25.5% 25.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 5.9% 5.9% Personal Incredulity Sitewide 0.2% Speaker 10.8% 10.8% Primacy Effect Sitewide 0.9% Speaker 10.8% 10.8% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 5.9% 5.9% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 7.8% 7.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% 80% 80% 100% 100% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 78.4%, sitewide 15.9% Framing Effect: Speaker 60.5%, sitewide 26.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 25.5%, sitewide 6.7% Indoctrination: Speaker 25.5%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Speaker 25.5%, sitewide 6.0% Negativity Bias: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 19.2% Personal Incredulity: Speaker 10.8%, sitewide 0.2% Primacy Effect: Speaker 10.8%, sitewide 0.9% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 3.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst