Speaker summary
⁠55%1 analyzed article/video110 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Louis Public Schools results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Framing Effect, and Indoctrination, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 30.9% saturation with 34 hits. Analysis detected 147 faulty-reasoning hits from 110 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 22.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (18,139 of 28,364 speakers). This Louis Public Schools is better (less manipulative) than 63.90% of the peer group.
Louis Public Schools
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠37%Louis Public Schools (selected)23%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 110
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

36% percentile
025507510036.1% percentile
22.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos110 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 30.9%30.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 30.9%30.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 13.6%13.6%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 13.6%13.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 13.6%13.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 30.9%30.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 30.9%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 30.9%, sitewide 7.5%Framing Effect: Speaker 30.9%, sitewide 26.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 13.6%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Speaker 13.6%, sitewide 2.5%Optimism Bias: Speaker 13.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos