Speaker summary
⁠56%1 analyzed article/video238.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lois Burak results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Unattributed Quote, and Hindsight Bias, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 23.2% saturation with 77 hits. Analysis detected 274 faulty-reasoning hits from 238.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 21.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠35% (18,623 of 28,364 speakers). This Lois Burak is better (less manipulative) than 65.70% of the peer group.
Lois Burak
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 238.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

34% percentile
025507510034.3% percentile
21.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos238.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Speaker 22.8%22.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 19.9%19.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 20.0%20.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 23.2%23.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 20.8%20.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 20.8%, sitewide 26.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 23.2%, sitewide 7.5%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 22.8%, sitewide 1.4%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 20.0%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 19.9%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos