Speaker summary
51% 3 analyzed articles/videos 150 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Liz Kendall results contain 13 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote , Appeal to Authority , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 31.5% saturation with 73 hits . Analysis detected 501.821 faulty-reasoning hits from 150 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 17% and a BS Rank of 27% (20,485 of 27,831 speakers). This Liz Kendall is better (less manipulative) than 73.60% of the peer group. Liz Kendall
Speaker details
Total words: 150
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
26% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 26.4% percentile 17.0% BS Score3 analyzed videos150 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 26.7% 26.7% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 20.7% 20.7% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 19.1% 19.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 22.4% 22.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 11.6% 11.6% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 9.9% 9.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 22.4% 22.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 11.6% 11.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 11.6% 11.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 31.5% 31.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 31.5%, sitewide 26.9% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 26.7%, sitewide 1.1% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 22.4%, sitewide 11.1% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 22.4%, sitewide 15.9% Bandwagon: Speaker 20.7%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 19.1%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 11.6%, sitewide 0.8% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 11.6%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 11.6%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 11.6%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Speaker 11.6%, sitewide 6.0% Halo Effect: Speaker 10.8%, sitewide 6.7% Begging the Question: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst