Speaker summary
⁠73%2 analyzed articles/videos126 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lindy Elkins-Tanton results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Optimism Bias, and Actor-Observer Bias, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 84 hits. Analysis detected 299.25 faulty-reasoning hits from 126 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 35.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (12,433 of 26,846 speakers). This Lindy Elkins-Tanton is worse (more manipulative) than 53.70% of the peer group.
Lindy Elkins-Tanton
Speaker details
Total words: 126
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

54% percentile
025507510053.7% percentile
35.4% BS Score2 analyzed videos126 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 37.5%37.5%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide 0.6%Speaker 25.0%25.0%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 25.0%25.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 25.0%25.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 37.5%, sitewide 11.1%Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 0.6%Begging the Question: Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 1.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 7.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos