Speaker summary
⁠66%1 analyzed article/video422.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lindsey LaPointe results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Optimism Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19.5% saturation with 155 hits. Analysis detected 892.83 faulty-reasoning hits from 422.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠7% (26,570 of 28,364 speakers). This Lindsey LaPointe is better (less manipulative) than 93.70% of the peer group.
Lindsey LaPointe
Speaker details
Total words: 422.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

6% percentile
02550751006.3% percentile
7.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos422.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 2.0%2.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 22.1%22.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 19.7%19.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 2.3%2.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 5.7%5.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 14.4%14.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 11.8%11.8%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 3.4%3.4%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide 0.6%Speaker 2.8%2.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 5.4%5.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 26.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 22.1%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Speaker 19.7%, sitewide 6.0%Negativity Bias: Speaker 19.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 15.3%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 14.4%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 7.5%Indoctrination: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 3.7%Burden of Proof: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 0.4%Begging the Question: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 1.7%Slippery Slope: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 1.7%Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 0.6%False Dilemma: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos