Speaker summary
⁠42%1 analyzed article/video2,680.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lindsay Chervinsky results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Anecdotal, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 23% saturation with 686.906 hits. Analysis detected 2,457.117 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,680.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠1% (28,237 of 28,364 speakers). This Lindsay Chervinsky is better (less manipulative) than 99.60% of the peer group.
Lindsay Chervinsky
Speaker details
Total words: 2,680.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

0% percentile
02550751000.4% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 0.1%0.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 23.0%23.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 0.3%0.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 3.5%3.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 0.0%0.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 2.5%2.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 23.0%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 0.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Speaker 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 0.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 0.8%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 3.1%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 1.7%Slippery Slope: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos