Speaker summary
⁠39%2 analyzed articles/videos315.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lindsay Addison results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Indoctrination, and Biased Writer Voice, with False Dilemma as the most egregious example at 26.1% saturation with 104 hits. Analysis detected 557 faulty-reasoning hits from 315.5 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 15.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠24% (21,752 of 28,364 speakers). This Lindsay Addison is better (less manipulative) than 76.70% of the peer group.
Lindsay Addison
Speaker details
Total words: 315.5
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

23% percentile
025507510023.3% percentile
15.5% BS Score2 analyzed videos315.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 26.1%26.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 22.8%22.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 26.1%26.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 6.0%6.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 13.0%13.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 9.8%9.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 13.0%13.0%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 9.8%9.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 13.0%13.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 26.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 26.1%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 26.1%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Speaker 22.8%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 13.0%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Speaker 13.0%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 13.0%, sitewide 4.6%Loss Aversion: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos