Speaker summary
49% 1 analyzed article/video 176 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lily Santoro results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias , Availability Heuristic , and Optimism Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 25% saturation with 66 hits . Analysis detected 369.75 faulty-reasoning hits from 176 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 13.9% and a BS Rank of 20% (22,704 of 28,364 speakers). This Lily Santoro is better (less manipulative) than 80.00% of the peer group. Lily Santoro
Speaker details
Total words: 176
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
20% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 20.0% percentile 13.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos176 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 28.4% 28.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 25.0% 25.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 12.5% 12.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 8.3% 8.3% Blind-Spot Bias Sitewide 0.2% Speaker 8.3% 8.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 16.7% 16.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 8.3% 8.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 12.9% 12.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 12.1% 12.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 12.5% 12.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% In-Group Bias: Speaker 28.4%, sitewide 6.9% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 16.7%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Speaker 12.9%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 12.5%, sitewide 8.1% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 12.5%, sitewide 3.7% Halo Effect: Speaker 12.1%, sitewide 6.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 0.8% Anecdotal: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 5.2% Blind-Spot Bias: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 0.2% Indoctrination: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 0.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst