Speaker summary
⁠75%1 analyzed article/video60 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lila Rose results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 93.3% saturation with 84 hits. Analysis detected 365.25 faulty-reasoning hits from 60 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 59.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠75% (7,109 of 28,364 speakers). This Lila Rose is worse (more manipulative) than 74.90% of the peer group.
Lila Rose
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 60
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

75% percentile
025507510074.9% percentile
59.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos60 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 93.3%93.3%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Speaker 93.3%93.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 86.7%86.7%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 43.3%43.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 43.3%43.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 6.7%6.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 10.0%10.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 93.3%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 93.3%, sitewide 1.4%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 86.7%, sitewide 8.1%False Dilemma: Speaker 43.3%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 43.3%, sitewide 1.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 19.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 10.0%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos