Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 669 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Olivia Rosane results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Politically Left Leaning Bias , and Indoctrination , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 38% saturation with 1,016 hits . Analysis detected 4,360 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,676 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.9% and a BS Rank of 83% (1,115 of 6,359 authors). This Olivia Rosane is worse (more manipulative) than 82.50% of the peer group. Olivia Rosane
Author details
Total words: 2,676
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
83% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 82.5% percentile 4.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 38.0% 38.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.1% 6.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 9.6% 9.6% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 11.2% 11.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.0% 1.0% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Author 8.9% 8.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 13.2% 13.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Appeal to Emotion: Author 38.0%, sitewide 15.9% Framing Effect: Author 6.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 13.2%, sitewide 19.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 11.2%, sitewide 2.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Indoctrination: Author 9.6%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 8.9%, sitewide 2.7% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 7.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.4%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Loss Aversion: Author 4.6%, sitewide 2.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 4.2%, sitewide 0.0% Ad Hominem: Author 4.1%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Author 3.7%, sitewide 1.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst