Speaker summary
⁠47%1 analyzed article/video516 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Levi Wagner results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 123 hits. Analysis detected 647.203 faulty-reasoning hits from 516 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5% and a BS Rank of ⁠3% (27,629 of 28,364 speakers). This Levi Wagner is better (less manipulative) than 97.40% of the peer group.
Levi Wagner
Speaker details
Total words: 516
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

3% percentile
02550751002.6% percentile
5.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos516 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 3.7%3.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 4.9%4.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 2.7%2.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 15.2%15.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 14.8%14.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 0.6%0.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 4.4%4.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 2.7%2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 4.3%4.3%No True ScotsmanSitewide 0.1%Speaker 3.6%3.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 15.2%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Speaker 14.8%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 3.7%No True Scotsman: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 0.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos