Speaker summary
⁠72%1 analyzed article/video249.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Leonard "Lipi" Sternheim results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, In-Group Bias, and Framing Effect, with Out-Group Homogeneity Bias as the most egregious example at 19.4% saturation with 78 hits. Analysis detected 564.953 faulty-reasoning hits from 249.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠14% (24,590 of 28,364 speakers). This Leonard "Lipi" Sternheim is better (less manipulative) than 86.70% of the peer group.
Leonard "Lipi" Sternheim
Speaker details
Total words: 249.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

13% percentile
025507510013.3% percentile
10.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos249.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 25.3%25.3%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 19.4%19.4%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 14.5%14.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 16.5%16.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 16.7%16.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 13.8%13.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 3.5%3.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 13.7%13.7%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 8.2%8.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 9.5%9.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 16.7%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 25.3%, sitewide 8.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 19.4%, sitewide 3.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 16.5%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 9.5%, sitewide 15.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 14.5%, sitewide 1.5%Optimism Bias: Speaker 13.8%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Speaker 13.7%, sitewide 6.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 13.5%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Begging the Question: Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 3.3%Circular Reasoning: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 0.1%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%No True Scotsman: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos