Speaker summary
⁠93%2 analyzed articles/videos42.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lending Tree results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Authority, and Confirmation Bias, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 75.4% saturation with 32.061 hits. Analysis detected 145.061 faulty-reasoning hits from 42.5 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 54.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (7,707 of 28,364 speakers). This Lending Tree is worse (more manipulative) than 72.80% of the peer group.
Lending Tree
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 42.5
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

73% percentile
025507510072.8% percentile
54.7% BS Score2 analyzed videos42.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 75.4%75.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 49.1%49.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 50.9%50.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 49.1%49.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 49.1%49.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 75.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 50.9%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 49.1%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 49.1%, sitewide 7.5%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 49.1%, sitewide 1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos