Speaker summary
⁠58%2 analyzed articles/videos279.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lee Asher results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Halo Effect, and Self-Serving Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 22.9% saturation with 138 hits. Analysis detected 990.761 faulty-reasoning hits from 279.333 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 9.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠12% (25,223 of 28,364 speakers). This Lee Asher is better (less manipulative) than 88.90% of the peer group.
Lee Asher
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 279.333
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

11% percentile
025507510011.1% percentile
9.9% BS Score2 analyzed videos279.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 25.2%25.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 20.4%20.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 15.1%15.1%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 12.0%12.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 10.1%10.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 11.6%11.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 3.5%3.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 22.9%22.9%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 6.8%6.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 10.3%10.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Halo Effect: Speaker 25.2%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 22.9%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 20.4%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 15.1%, sitewide 3.7%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 13.1%, sitewide 9.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 12.0%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 11.6%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 10.3%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 10.1%, sitewide 1.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 9.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 7.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 4.0%Bandwagon: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 2.2%Horn Effect: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 1.0%Halo EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos