Speaker summary
⁠43%1 analyzed article/video754.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Leander Schaerlaeckens results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Halo Effect, and Framing Effect, with Representativeness Heuristic as the most egregious example at 15.5% saturation with 251 hits. Analysis detected 1,695.841 faulty-reasoning hits from 754.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠3% (27,673 of 28,364 speakers). This Leander Schaerlaeckens is better (less manipulative) than 97.60% of the peer group.
Leander Schaerlaeckens
Speaker details
Total words: 754.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

2% percentile
02550751002.4% percentile
4.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos754.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 7.4%7.4%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 15.5%15.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 6.5%6.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 17.3%17.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 11.8%11.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 0.7%0.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 5.4%5.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 2.2%2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 4.5%4.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 3.1%3.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 17.3%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 15.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 15.5%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Circular Reasoning: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 0.1%Genetic Fallacy: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos