Speaker summary
56%1 analyzed article/video150.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Leah Salerno results contain 13 faulty reasoning types, including Loss Aversion, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 56.6% saturation with 64 hits. Analysis detected 471.375 faulty-reasoning hits from 150.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 18.7% and a BS Rank of 30% (19,960 of 28,364 speakers). This Leah Salerno is better (less manipulative) than 70.40% of the peer group.
Leah Salerno
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 150.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

30% percentile
025507510029.6% percentile
18.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos150.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 56.6%56.6%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 25.2%25.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 26.8%26.8%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 15.5%15.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 12.8%12.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 12.8%12.8%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 12.8%12.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 12.4%12.4%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 12.4%12.4%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 9.3%9.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Speaker 56.6%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 26.8%, sitewide 8.1%Loss Aversion: Speaker 25.2%, sitewide 2.5%Negativity Bias: Speaker 24.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 15.9%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 15.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Speaker 12.4%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Speaker 12.4%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 9.3%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 9.3%, sitewide 3.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos