Speaker summary
⁠67%1 analyzed article/video261.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Leah Livshitz results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Burden of Proof, Availability Heuristic, and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 33.4% saturation with 98.406 hits. Analysis detected 492.571 faulty-reasoning hits from 261.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠10% (25,617 of 28,364 speakers). This Leah Livshitz is better (less manipulative) than 90.30% of the peer group.
Leah Livshitz
Speaker details
Total words: 261.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

10% percentile
02550751009.7% percentile
9.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos261.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 33.4%33.4%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 12.4%12.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 7.4%7.4%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 8.2%8.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 13.6%13.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 5.5%5.5%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 7.6%7.6%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 6.2%6.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 13.8%13.8%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Speaker 6.8%6.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 33.4%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 13.8%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 13.6%, sitewide 7.5%Burden of Proof: Speaker 12.4%, sitewide 0.4%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 6.7%Begging the Question: Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 2.7%In-Group Bias: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 6.9%Bandwagon: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos