Speaker summary
⁠61%1 analyzed article/video56 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Law Society of Newfoundland and Labrador results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Primacy Effect and Red Herring, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 28 hits. Analysis detected 84 faulty-reasoning hits from 56 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠68% (9,267 of 28,364 speakers). This Law Society of Newfoundland and Labrador is worse (more manipulative) than 67.30% of the peer group.
Law Society of Newfoundland and Labrador
Speaker details
Total words: 56
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

67% percentile
025507510067.3% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos56 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 7.5%Primacy Effect: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.9%Red Herring: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos