Speaker summary
⁠75%1 analyzed article/video167 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Laurence Fox results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Unattributed Quote, and Appeal to Emotion, with Out-Group Homogeneity Bias as the most egregious example at 51.3% saturation with 162 hits. Analysis detected 1,009.606 faulty-reasoning hits from 167 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 17.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠29% (27,604 of 38,479 speakers). This Laurence Fox is better (less manipulative) than 71.70% of the peer group.
Laurence Fox
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠29%Laurence Fox (selected)18%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 167
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

28% percentile
025507510028.3% percentile
17.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos167 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 51.3%51.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.3%50.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 39.2%39.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 30.4%30.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 1.3%1.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 44.7%44.7%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Speaker 21.8%21.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 14.6%14.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 14.2%14.2%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 14.2%14.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 51.3%, sitewide 3.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.3%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 44.7%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 39.2%, sitewide 8.1%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 30.4%, sitewide 1.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 26.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 21.8%, sitewide 1.4%Indoctrination: Speaker 14.6%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 14.2%, sitewide 0.8%In-Group Bias: Speaker 14.2%, sitewide 6.9%Straw Man: Speaker 14.2%, sitewide 0.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 10.1%, sitewide 1.5%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 5.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 2.7%Primacy Effect: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 0.9%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 1.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 1.7%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos