Speaker summary
⁠61%1 analyzed article/video57.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lauren Swift results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority and Hindsight Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 75% saturation with 48.375 hits. Analysis detected 134.375 faulty-reasoning hits from 57.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 58.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠75% (7,259 of 28,364 speakers). This Lauren Swift is worse (more manipulative) than 74.40% of the peer group.
Lauren Swift
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 57.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

74% percentile
025507510074.4% percentile
58.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos57.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 11.1%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos