KUOW - How to deal with seesawing gas prices 22%

By Joe Hernandez0%

7/9/2026, 8:30:25 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Indoctrination, and Appeal to Emotion, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 18.7% saturation with 164 hits. Analysis detected 1,399 faulty-reasoning hits from 878 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 36% and a BS Rank of 22% (16,038 of 20,516 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 78.20% of the article peer group.

How to deal with seesawing gas prices 
William Mao puts fuel in his vehicle at a gas station in Miami, Florida on April 6. 
Getty Images North America 
To say gas prices have been unpredictable this year would be an understatement. 
On Thursday morning, drivers across the U.S. were spending an average of $3.85 per gallon of regular unleaded, according to AAA . 
The average cost of a gallon this year peaked in May at $4.56, and plunged as low as $2.79 in January, the organization reported. 
Oil prices have spiked around the world in recent months after the U.S. and Israel launched a war on Iran, which has disrupted shipping through the Strait of Hormuz. 
But the on-and-off hostilities have done more than simply raise gas prices in a straight line  they've caused gas to become more expensive one week, only for the price to fall the next. 
Prices go up when fighting rekindles or the strait is closed, and drop when peace talks resume. 
They're climbing again after Trump said the tenuous ceasefire was over. 
Now, drivers are unsure of what price they'll find when they pull into a gas station, said Emily Blain, an accredited financial counselor in Minnesota. 
"'How bad is it going to be this time? 
Is it going to be not as bad as I think, or is it going to be worse than I think?'" 
Blain said. 
That can contribute to stress, she added, "and since many people are going to the gas pump fairly often, that absolutely adds up." 
How volatile prices affect consumer behavior 
When it comes to price, gas is one of the more volatile consumer goods. 
U.S. motor fuel prices jumped as much as 35.8% annually over the last two decades and fell by as much as 27.8% in the same period, according to the USDA's Economic Research Service. 
That unpredictability can influence consumers' buying habits  and it's been doing so in recent months. 
Data from the cash back app Upside found that when gas prices rose in the first two and a half weeks of March, drivers visited gas stations more often but bought less fuel each time. 
"Some drivers can't afford to fill up their tank at a given time, so there's definitely some cash constraints," said Upside principal research economist Thomas Weinandy. 
Other drivers might be in the habit of spending a set amount on fuel, which now buys less than it did weeks or months earlier, he added. 
"Someone might be used to just saying, 'put $20 on pump 1,' and they continue that behavior." 
When prices fall back down, drivers typically buy more gas per visit, a phenomenon Weinandy says began to appear in the June data. 
Experts say that consumers can expect price swings to stick around. 
Lauren Swift, senior editor for Autotrader and Kelley Blue Book, told NPR over email that historically when "gas prices have seen a sharp uptick due to war or other global conflicts, they take a very long time to come back down, typically years." 
Though changes in the price of gas can often appear minimal, increases can put a dent in household budgets over time. 
The financial website NerdWallet found that a $0.50-per-gallon spike could cost drivers in some states around $500 more per year. 
"There is not much control you have over the prices, so all we can really do is to prepare to pay more at the pump," said Kimberly Palmer, personal finance expert at NerdWallet. 
But drivers still have a say in what they spend on fuel, she said. 
Here are a few strategies consumers can use to deal with fluctuating gas prices: 
Assume the price will be high, and build that into your budget. 
"If we plan ahead knowing that gas prices are expected to be higher, then it can be a nice surprise if they end up going down that week," Palmer said. 
If prices drop instead, you'll have some money left over. 
Use websites or apps to shop around for the best price. 
Palmer said driving even a few miles out of your way could be worth it to pay substantially less per gallon. 
Use less gas. 
That could mean cutting back on driving, if that's an option for you. 
It could also mean adopting fuel-saving driving habits , such as driving more smoothly, ensuring your tires are inflated and removing excess weight from your vehicle. 
You may also consider switching to an electric vehicle, if that's within your budget. 
Spending less money on gas now gives you a financial cushion should prices rise again later. 
For most people, the monthly cost of gas will be dwarfed by other household expenses like housing. 
But Blain, the financial counselor, said rent increases and property tax hikes typically occur annually and then appear as predictable monthly expenses. 
Fluctuating expenses, like groceries and gas, are different and can have a more immediate impact on consumers  even if they're a smaller share of your budget. 
"You never know what you're going to get, to a certain extent," Blain said. 
"That feels really uncomfortable regardless of the actual dollar-and-cent impact, which can also be significant at times." 
Why you can trust KUOW 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Joe Hernandez: 2.6%KUOW: 2.6%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 1.6%Joe Hernandez: 1.2%KUOW: 1.3%Anchoring Bias1.6%This article: 3.3%Joe Hernandez: 2.2%KUOW: 3.4%Availability Heuristic3.3%This article: 5.5%Joe Hernandez: 1.2%KUOW: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic5.5%This article: 4.9%Joe Hernandez: 0.4%KUOW: 0.7%Hindsight Bias4.9%This article: 5.4%Joe Hernandez: 1.5%KUOW: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias5.4%This article: 4.1%Joe Hernandez: 4.0%KUOW: 7.4%Framing Effect4.1%This article: 7.6%Joe Hernandez: 1.1%KUOW: 1.0%Loss Aversion7.6%This article: 1.3%Joe Hernandez: 0.9%KUOW: 1.0%Status Quo Bias1.3%This article: 0.0%Joe Hernandez: 0.0%KUOW: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 8.1%Joe Hernandez: 2.3%KUOW: 3.8%Optimism Bias8.1%This article: 6.9%Joe Hernandez: 2.3%KUOW: 1.8%Pessimism Bias6.9%This article: 17.0%Joe Hernandez: 7.4%KUOW: 8.0%Negativity Bias17.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Hernandez: 3.1%KUOW: 2.0%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 3.0%Joe Hernandez: 2.3%KUOW: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error3.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Hernandez: 0.0%KUOW: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Hernandez: 5.1%KUOW: 2.0%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Hernandez: 3.4%KUOW: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.6%Joe Hernandez: 1.1%KUOW: 2.7%Halo Effect0.6%This article: 0.0%Joe Hernandez: 0.7%KUOW: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Hernandez: 0.0%KUOW: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 2.6%Joe Hernandez: 1.7%KUOW: 1.1%Recency Bias2.6%This article: 2.5%Joe Hernandez: 0.4%KUOW: 0.4%Primacy Effect2.5%This article: 0.0%Joe Hernandez: 0.0%KUOW: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Hernandez: 2.7%KUOW: 0.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Hernandez: 0.5%KUOW: 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 18.7%Joe Hernandez: 4.8%KUOW: 4.3%Appeal to Authority18.7%This article: 7.7%Joe Hernandez: 0.9%KUOW: 1.4%False Dilemma7.7%This article: 0.0%Joe Hernandez: 0.0%KUOW: 0.9%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Hernandez: 0.0%KUOW: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 10.5%Joe Hernandez: 5.6%KUOW: 4.1%Hasty Generalization10.5%This article: 0.0%Joe Hernandez: 0.0%KUOW: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Hernandez: 0.8%KUOW: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 11.4%Joe Hernandez: 7.0%KUOW: 6.1%Appeal to Emotion11.4%This article: 0.0%Joe Hernandez: 0.0%KUOW: 0.8%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 6.5%Joe Hernandez: 2.7%KUOW: 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)6.5%This article: 0.0%Joe Hernandez: 0.0%KUOW: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Hernandez: 0.2%KUOW: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Hernandez: 0.1%KUOW: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Hernandez: 1.1%KUOW: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 5.9%Joe Hernandez: 2.1%KUOW: 3.3%Anecdotal5.9%This article: 0.0%Joe Hernandez: 0.0%KUOW: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 3.1%Joe Hernandez: 0.7%KUOW: 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)3.1%This article: 0.0%Joe Hernandez: 0.0%KUOW: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Hernandez: 0.0%KUOW: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Hernandez: 0.0%KUOW: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Hernandez: 0.0%KUOW: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Hernandez: 0.9%KUOW: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Hernandez: 0.3%KUOW: 1.0%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 1.0%Joe Hernandez: 0.4%KUOW: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection1.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Hernandez: 1.2%KUOW: 3.2%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 13.4%Joe Hernandez: 1.7%KUOW: 1.5%Indoctrination13.4%This article: 0.0%Joe Hernandez: 0.0%KUOW: 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Hernandez: 0.2%KUOW: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 6.8%Joe Hernandez: 0.6%KUOW: 1.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…6.8%

878 words analyzed.

Speakers

9speakers55%attributed speech397writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageGetty Images North America • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageAAA • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageEmily Blain • 25 words • 0.0% coverageEmily Blain • 9 words • 100.0% coverageEmily Blain • 21 words • 0.0% coverageEmily Blain • 2 words • 0.0% coverageEmily Blain • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageUSDA's Economic Research Service • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageUpside • 35 words • 100.0% coverageThomas Weinandy • 26 words • 0.0% coverageThomas Weinandy • 27 words • 0.0% coverageThomas Weinandy • 17 words • 0.0% coverageThomas Weinandy • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageLauren Swift • 43 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageNerdWallet • 20 words • 0.0% coverageKimberly Palmer • 33 words • 100.0% coverageKimberly Palmer • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageKimberly Palmer • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageKimberly Palmer • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageEmily Blain • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageEmily Blain • 14 words • 0.0% coverageEmily Blain • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Lauren Swift

100%flagged-word coverage
43 attributed words8.9% of attributed speech86% writer coverage
0%12.5%25.0%Indoctrination-21.4 ptsWriter: 21.4%Lauren Swift: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -6.3 ptsWriter: 6.3%Lauren Swift: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.