Speaker summary
ā 74%1 analyzed article/video89 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lauren Moberg results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 48.3% saturation with 43 hits. Analysis detected 80.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 89 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 45.2% and a BS Rank of ā 62% (10,828 of 28,364 speakers). This Lauren Moberg is worse (more manipulative) than 61.80% of the peer group.
Lauren Moberg
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
ā 0%The Brookings Institution1%
ā 0%Gen Jack Keane1%
ā 0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
ā 0%Mike Muse1%
ā 0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
ā 62%Lauren Moberg (selected)46%
ā 100%4MATIV100%
ā 100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
ā 100%314 Action Fund100%
ā 100%21 Grams100%
ā 100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 89
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

62% percentile
025507510061.8% percentile
45.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos89 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0ā€“75%
0.0%20%40%60%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 42.1%42.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 48.3%48.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Negativity Bias: Speaker 48.3%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 42.1%, sitewide 9.1%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos