Speaker summary
⁠77%1 analyzed article/video140.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lauren Andrews results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Hasty Generalization, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 33.6% saturation with 74 hits. Analysis detected 316.022 faulty-reasoning hits from 140.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 22.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (17,956 of 28,364 speakers). This Lauren Andrews is better (less manipulative) than 63.30% of the peer group.
Lauren Andrews
Speaker details
Total words: 140.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

37% percentile
025507510036.7% percentile
22.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos140.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 42.0%42.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 33.6%33.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 22.7%22.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 16.4%16.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 16.4%16.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 11.4%11.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 16.4%16.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Optimism Bias: Speaker 42.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Speaker 33.6%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 22.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 16.4%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 16.4%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 16.4%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 11.4%, sitewide 0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos