Speaker summary
⁠61%1 analyzed article/video85.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Laura Steele results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 114 hits. Analysis detected 171 faulty-reasoning hits from 85.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 75% and a BS Rank of ⁠81% (5,467 of 28,364 speakers). This Laura Steele is worse (more manipulative) than 80.70% of the peer group.
Laura Steele
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 85.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

81% percentile
025507510080.7% percentile
75.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos85.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos