Speaker summary
⁠82%1 analyzed article/video132 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Laura Dumais results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Burden of Proof, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 82.4% saturation with 108.75 hits. Analysis detected 299.125 faulty-reasoning hits from 132 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 39.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (11,917 of 28,364 speakers). This Laura Dumais is worse (more manipulative) than 58.00% of the peer group.
Laura Dumais
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 132
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

58% percentile
025507510058.0% percentile
39.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos132 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 82.4%82.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 28.4%28.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 34.4%34.4%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 82.4%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 34.4%, sitewide 8.1%Burden of Proof: Speaker 28.4%, sitewide 0.4%Ad Hominem: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos