Speaker summary
⁠93%1 analyzed article/video48 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Laura Bakst results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Hasty Generalization, and Negativity Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 64 hits. Analysis detected 224 faulty-reasoning hits from 48 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 80% and a BS Rank of ⁠82% (5,164 of 28,364 speakers). This Laura Bakst is worse (more manipulative) than 81.80% of the peer group.
Laura Bakst
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 48
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

82% percentile
025507510081.8% percentile
80.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos48 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Anecdotal: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.0%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos