Speaker summary
⁠38%1 analyzed article/video211.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These LaToya Mbayu results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias, Appeal to Nature, and Representativeness Heuristic, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 30% saturation with 88 hits. Analysis detected 270 faulty-reasoning hits from 211.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠12% (24,986 of 28,364 speakers). This LaToya Mbayu is better (less manipulative) than 88.10% of the peer group.
LaToya Mbayu
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 211.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

12% percentile
025507510011.9% percentile
10.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos211.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 30.0%30.0%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Speaker 11.3%11.3%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 10.9%10.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 11.3%11.3%Composition/DivisionSitewide 0.2%Speaker 4.8%4.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 4.8%4.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 4.8%4.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 9.6%9.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 4.8%4.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Anecdotal: Speaker 30.0%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 4.0%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 0.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 1.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 9.6%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 0.8%Composition/Division: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 0.2%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos