Speaker summary
⁠62%2 analyzed articles/videos40.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Larry Ellison results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Begging the Question, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 35% saturation with 21 hits. Analysis detected 156 faulty-reasoning hits from 40.5 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 32.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠51% (13,393 of 26,899 speakers). This Larry Ellison is worse (more manipulative) than 50.20% of the peer group.
Larry Ellison
Speaker details
Total words: 40.5
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

50% percentile
025507510050.2% percentile
32.5% BS Score2 analyzed videos40.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 35.0%35.0%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 35.0%35.0%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Speaker 30.0%30.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 30.0%30.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 35.0%35.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 30.0%30.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 30.0%30.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 35.0%35.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 35.0%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 35.0%, sitewide 9.1%Begging the Question: Speaker 35.0%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 35.0%, sitewide 0.0%Ad Hominem: Speaker 30.0%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 30.0%, sitewide 5.3%Genetic Fallacy: Speaker 30.0%, sitewide 1.4%Halo Effect: Speaker 30.0%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos