Speaker summary
⁠49%2 analyzed articles/videos110.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Landmarks Preservation Commission results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Representativeness Heuristic, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 56.7% saturation with 101 hits. Analysis detected 208.54 faulty-reasoning hits from 110.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 31.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠50% (14,284 of 28,364 speakers). This Landmarks Preservation Commission is better (less manipulative) than 50.40% of the peer group.
Landmarks Preservation Commission
Speaker details
Total words: 110.667
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

50% percentile
025507510049.6% percentile
31.7% BS Score2 analyzed videos110.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 56.7%56.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 33.4%33.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 23.0%23.0%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 13.5%13.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 56.7%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 33.4%, sitewide 6.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 23.0%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 13.5%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos