Speaker summary
⁠93%1 analyzed article/video12 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lafayette district attorney results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 12 hits. Analysis detected 24 faulty-reasoning hits from 12 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠92% (2,421 of 28,364 speakers). This Lafayette district attorney is worse (more manipulative) than 91.50% of the peer group.
Lafayette district attorney
Speaker details
Total words: 12
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

92% percentile
025507510091.5% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos12 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos