Speaker summary
⁠93%1 analyzed article/video69 analyzed words
BS Summary: These L7's statement results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Loss Aversion and Halo Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 69 hits. Analysis detected 150 faulty-reasoning hits from 69 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 72.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠80% (5,717 of 28,364 speakers). This L7's statement is worse (more manipulative) than 79.80% of the peer group.
L7's statement
Speaker details
Total words: 69
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

80% percentile
025507510079.8% percentile
72.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos69 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 17.4%17.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Loss Aversion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 2.5%Halo Effect: Speaker 17.4%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos