Speaker summary
⁠78%2 analyzed articles/videos326 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kyle Davidson results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Appeal to Emotion, and Biased Writer Voice, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 63.4% saturation with 206.832 hits. Analysis detected 765.832 faulty-reasoning hits from 326 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 18.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠29% (20,173 of 28,364 speakers). This Kyle Davidson is better (less manipulative) than 71.10% of the peer group.
Kyle Davidson
Speaker details
Total words: 326
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

29% percentile
025507510028.9% percentile
18.3% BS Score2 analyzed videos326 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 63.5%63.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 18.6%18.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 14.1%14.1%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 15.2%15.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 20.7%20.7%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 8.6%8.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 18.6%18.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 9.4%9.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 7.7%7.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 6.6%6.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Halo Effect: Speaker 63.5%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 20.7%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 18.6%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 18.6%, sitewide 5.3%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 15.2%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 14.1%, sitewide 1.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 9.4%, sitewide 7.5%False Dilemma: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 1.5%Optimism Bias: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos