Blackhawks reunite with Patrick Kane, signing him to two-year contract 32%

By Ben Pope68%

7/23/2026, 8:07:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 28 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Biased Writer Voice, and Halo Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 21.5% saturation with 171 hits. Analysis detected 1,284 faulty-reasoning hits from 797 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 40.8% and a BS Rank of 32% (15,052 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 68.80% of the article peer group.

Patrick Kane is coming home  to his adopted home, not his childhood home. 
The Blackhawks legend reunited with the team Thursday, signing a two-year contract that carries an $8 million salary-cap hit. 
Kane, who grew up in Buffalo, spent the last three weeks deciding between offers from the Hawks and Sabres. 
For Hawks general manager Kyle Davidson, bringing back Kane after trading him to the Rangers three years ago represents a much-needed crowd-pleasing move  and a pivot from a previous stance. 
“Day in and day out for 16 seasons, Patrick captivated the city of Chicago with his dazzling skill, creating some of the most memorable moments in Blackhawks history as he helped bring our storied franchise back to the pinnacle of our sport,” Davidson said in a statement. 
“He’s shown on countless occasions that he knows what it takes to win at the highest levels, and we couldn’t be prouder for Patrick to once again call the United Center home and continue to shine in Chicago’s brightest lights.” 
Kane’s agent, Pat Brisson, said via text that Kane is “extremely excited,” adding that Chicago is “where he belongs.” 
two more years of S H O W T I M E 🍿 pic.twitter.com/ZTc6Xhi3ef 
- Chicago Blackhawks (@NHLBlackhawks) July 23, 2026 
Hawks fans are extremely excited, as well. 
They’ve endured a lot of losing and bad news over the last six years, and they deserved something to celebrate. 
This certainly qualifies. 
“[There were] tears when the push notification popped up,” Hawks fan Colin McMahon said. 
“Lived through the bad years and the good years. 
This is wonderful.” 
“I got a 6 a.m. 
ESPN alert out here in [Arizona],” fan Garell Jordan said. 
“Then I woke up my husband. 
Then we went and got celebration waffles. 
Life is good.” 
“I literally dropped my phone and threw my arms in the air,” James Leach said. 
Kane is 37 years old but remains a productive wing, recording 163 points in 189 games over the last three seasons with the Red Wings  including 57 points (41 of which were assists) in 67 games last season. 
The Wings narrowly missed the playoffs all three years. 
He followed his former team fairly closely throughout his absence, praising the Hawks’ “up-and-coming players” and Connor Bedard’s ability to “make plays that other guys can’t” to the Sun-Times last November . 
Kane won’t be able to start the season next to Bedard while the latter recovers from shoulder surgery, but they likely will play together eventually. 
Bedard made an impassioned pitch for Kane to sign earlier this week, dreaming about the “juice” that will flow through the United Center for Kane’s first home game Oct. 
6. 
Kane’s contract contains a full no-movement clause, according to the Hawks. 
It also gives him a massive raise  in other words, it overpays him  considering he made between $2.75 million and $4 million in each of his three seasons with the Wings. 
The Hawks easily can fit $8 million in the short term, though. 
When Davidson dealt Kane and declined to re-sign Jonathan Toews in 2023, he explained he wanted to give the Hawks’ new generation  including Bedard  a blank slate to grow into leadership roles instead of deferring to franchise legends. 
And in 2024, Davidson said he didn’t foresee going back on that decision. 
Two years later, Davidson indeed has gone back on it  wisely. 
He evidently believes enough of that leadership growth has occurred that Kane’s return won’t disrupt it. 
Toews’ retirement also might have made this decision less complicated; bringing back one of the two legends might have been awkward. 
Kane already had been training at Blackhawks Ice Center this summer, wearing his old Wings jersey. 
According to the Hawks, he was on the ice again Thursday morning, apparently following his normal routine, only this time wearing a Hawks jersey. 
He and Davidson will discuss the signing at a news conference Friday. 
Latest on the Blackhawks 
Connor Bedard happy with new deal, Blackhawks' additions but would love to see Patrick Kane return 
Bedard raved about Bowen Byram and Ian Cole  and the possibility of Kane  on Monday from his backyard in Vancouver, where he will spend the rest of the offseason rehabbing his shoulder. 
Connor Bedard's agent spells out contract talks with Blackhawks, decision on shoulder surgery 
Agent Don Meehan discusses why the sides compromised on a five-year term, how they reacted to Leo Carlsson’s offer sheet and what the outlook is for Bedard’s shoulder after he had surgery in Colorado. 
Connor Bedard signs five-year contract as Blackhawks complete biggest offseason task 
One day after his 21st birthday, Bedard inked a deal Saturday that carries a $15 million salary-cap hit. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 5.6%Ben Pope: 3.2%Chicago Sun-Times: 3.0%Confirmation Bias5.6%This article: 4.1%Ben Pope: 1.9%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.6%Anchoring Bias4.1%This article: 8.0%Ben Pope: 3.2%Chicago Sun-Times: 2.9%Availability Heuristic8.0%This article: 4.9%Ben Pope: 2.4%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic4.9%This article: 1.5%Ben Pope: 2.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.7%Hindsight Bias1.5%This article: 5.0%Ben Pope: 3.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 1.0%Overconfidence Bias5.0%This article: 3.8%Ben Pope: 4.5%Chicago Sun-Times: 5.3%Framing Effect3.8%This article: 4.1%Ben Pope: 1.5%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.7%Loss Aversion4.1%This article: 8.9%Ben Pope: 2.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.7%Status Quo Bias8.9%This article: 0.0%Ben Pope: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 6.3%Ben Pope: 10.6%Chicago Sun-Times: 2.6%Optimism Bias6.3%This article: 0.0%Ben Pope: 1.2%Chicago Sun-Times: 1.4%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 2.5%Ben Pope: 2.1%Chicago Sun-Times: 7.9%Negativity Bias2.5%This article: 1.1%Ben Pope: 2.3%Chicago Sun-Times: 1.7%Self-Serving Bias1.1%This article: 0.0%Ben Pope: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 1.0%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Pope: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 4.8%Ben Pope: 3.7%Chicago Sun-Times: 1.7%In-Group Bias4.8%This article: 0.0%Ben Pope: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 10.9%Ben Pope: 8.7%Chicago Sun-Times: 2.9%Halo Effect10.9%This article: 0.0%Ben Pope: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Pope: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 8.5%Ben Pope: 3.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 1.6%Recency Bias8.5%This article: 0.0%Ben Pope: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Pope: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Pope: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.8%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Pope: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 8.3%Ben Pope: 3.8%Chicago Sun-Times: 2.8%Appeal to Authority8.3%This article: 5.0%Ben Pope: 0.7%Chicago Sun-Times: 1.5%False Dilemma5.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Pope: 0.2%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.4%Ben Pope: 0.1%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.4%This article: 0.9%Ben Pope: 1.4%Chicago Sun-Times: 4.6%Hasty Generalization0.9%This article: 0.0%Ben Pope: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 1.8%Ben Pope: 0.4%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.6%Bandwagon1.8%This article: 21.5%Ben Pope: 4.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 5.5%Appeal to Emotion21.5%This article: 1.5%Ben Pope: 0.5%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.9%Begging the Question1.5%This article: 2.6%Ben Pope: 1.6%Chicago Sun-Times: 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)2.6%This article: 0.0%Ben Pope: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Pope: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Pope: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Pope: 0.7%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.4%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 13.7%Ben Pope: 2.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 3.1%Anecdotal13.7%This article: 0.0%Ben Pope: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 7.2%Ben Pope: 1.7%Chicago Sun-Times: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)7.2%This article: 0.0%Ben Pope: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 3.1%Ben Pope: 0.5%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.1%Middle Ground3.1%This article: 0.0%Ben Pope: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Pope: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Pope: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Pope: 2.4%Chicago Sun-Times: 1.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Pope: 0.3%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 13.3%Ben Pope: 4.5%Chicago Sun-Times: 4.3%Biased Writer Voice13.3%This article: 0.0%Ben Pope: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 2.2%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Pope: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Pope: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 1.8%Ben Pope: 0.6%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…1.8%

797 words analyzed.

Speakers

6speakers34%attributed speech528writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageKyle Davidson • 31 words • 0.0% coverageKyle Davidson • 47 words • 100.0% coverageKyle Davidson • 40 words • 100.0% coveragePat Brisson • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageChicago Blackhawks • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageColin McMahon • 14 words • 0.0% coverageColin McMahon • 9 words • 0.0% coverageColin McMahon • 3 words • 0.0% coverageGarell Jordan • 5 words • 0.0% coverageGarell Jordan • 10 words • 0.0% coverageGarell Jordan • 6 words • 0.0% coverageGarell Jordan • 7 words • 0.0% coverageGarell Jordan • 3 words • 0.0% coverageJames Leach • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageKyle Davidson • 40 words • 0.0% coverageKyle Davidson • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

James Leach

100%flagged-word coverage
15 attributed words5.6% of attributed speech66% writer coverage
0%2.5%5.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -2.7 ptsWriter: 2.7%James Leach: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.