Topic summary
⁠37%1 analyzed article/video797 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Patrick Kane results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Halo Effect, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 220 hits. Analysis detected 1,833 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,391 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠43% (9,444 of 16,562 topics). This Patrick Kane is better (less manipulative) than 57.00% of the peer group.
Patrick Kane
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,391
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

43% percentile
025507510043.0% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.6%6.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.0%2.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.2%9.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.9%1.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.1%2.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 8.9%8.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos