Speaker summary
⁠93%1 analyzed article/video47 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kwan Noh-jung results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Quote-first Misdirection, and Pessimism Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 44.7% saturation with 21 hits. Analysis detected 105 faulty-reasoning hits from 47 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 37.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (12,601 of 28,364 speakers). This Kwan Noh-jung is worse (more manipulative) than 55.60% of the peer group.
Kwan Noh-jung
Speaker details
Total words: 47
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

56% percentile
025507510055.6% percentile
37.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos47 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 44.7%44.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 44.7%44.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 34.0%34.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 34.0%34.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 44.7%44.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 21.3%21.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 44.7%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 44.7%, sitewide 19.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 44.7%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 34.0%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 34.0%, sitewide 1.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 21.3%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos