SK Hynix says 2027 will be the 'worst year' for memory shortage 34%

By Jake Roach24%

7/11/2026, 6:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 22 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Negativity Bias, and Pessimism Bias, with Recency Bias as the most egregious example at 24.3% saturation with 125 hits. Analysis detected 806 faulty-reasoning hits from 515 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 42% and a BS Rank of 34% (14,497 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 66.20% of the article peer group.

SK Hynix CEO Kwak Noh-jung says that 2027 will be the "worst year" for the ongoing memory shortage in comments shared with Reuters . 
The remark comes on the heels of SK Hynix successfully marking the largest-ever IPO for a foreign company on the U.S. stock market, raising $26.5 billion. 
Although Kwak points to next year being the worst for RAM shortages, the executive expects the memory crunch to last until 2030. 
Go deeper with TH Premium: Memory 
(Image credit: SK Hynix) AI data centers are swallowing the world's memory and storage supply 
The future of DRAM: From DDR5 to future ICs 
High-bandwidth memory roadmap 
Here's why HBM is coming for your PC's RAM 
"We forecast that next year will be the worst year in the industry's history from the supply perspective," Kwan told Reuters. 
"We still forecast that customer demand will remain higher than our ​supply capacity even beyond 2030. 
But we are doing our best to solve the problem." 
In March, SK Group chairman Chey Tae-won also suggested shortages would last until 2030, and the company has previously pointed to 2027 as a key shortage point , alongside Samsung. 
DRAM demand is largely driven by the HBM used in AI accelerators, which require far more sophisticated manufacturing and packaging processes compared to consumer DDR5. 
On top of advanced manufacturing, HBM also consumes more wafer capacity than DDR5, forcing major memory brands to reallocate supply and double down on an already sticky supply situation. 
Forecasts like this are tricky. 
It's in SK Hynix's financial interest for memory shortages to continue, even well beyond 2030. 
SK Hynix has set a record for quarter-over-quarter revenue, and rival Micron has seen its stock value increase 213% this year, pushing its share price to around $990. 
However, Kwan's remarks aren't just a bid to rally behind SK Hynix stock. 
Over the past few months, we've seen Micron and SK Hynix ink long-term supply agreements (LTAs). 
These agreements commit supply over multiple years to particular companies and define a price floor and ceiling during the agreement term. 
Although LTAs don't directly influence market prices, they secure demand, and we've seen a lot of LTAs over the past several months to bind DRAM supply. 
Although memory (and NAND) prices will remain elevated for at least the next several months, we've seen some signs of the market cooling. 
Earlier this month, a TrendForce report showed DRAM contract prices up 15% to 18% quarter over quarter for Q3 2026. 
That's a large increase, but far lower than the QoQ increases we've seen previously. 
We're nearing some semblance of stability in the memory market, just stability at vastly elevated prices. 
How long that lasts is anyone's guess. 
Although memory brands like SK Hynix have visibility into market trends, those can rapidly change. 
Just this year, we've seen a massive pivot toward AI spending going toward CPUs, pushing Intel's stock to record highs while shedding around $1 trillion in Nvidia's market cap; a year ago, that would've been almost impossible to predict. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 5.0%Jake Roach: 2.2%Tom's Hardware: 3.8%Confirmation Bias5.0%This article: 0.0%Jake Roach: 2.1%Tom's Hardware: 2.3%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 5.4%Jake Roach: 1.2%Tom's Hardware: 3.5%Availability Heuristic5.4%This article: 0.0%Jake Roach: 0.3%Tom's Hardware: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 7.6%Jake Roach: 1.5%Tom's Hardware: 0.5%Hindsight Bias7.6%This article: 1.4%Jake Roach: 3.3%Tom's Hardware: 3.5%Overconfidence Bias1.4%This article: 4.1%Jake Roach: 7.7%Tom's Hardware: 9.2%Framing Effect4.1%This article: 0.0%Jake Roach: 0.0%Tom's Hardware: 0.9%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Jake Roach: 0.6%Tom's Hardware: 0.7%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jake Roach: 0.0%Tom's Hardware: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 5.0%Jake Roach: 2.0%Tom's Hardware: 6.0%Optimism Bias5.0%This article: 11.8%Jake Roach: 2.2%Tom's Hardware: 2.0%Pessimism Bias11.8%This article: 15.7%Jake Roach: 5.9%Tom's Hardware: 6.5%Negativity Bias15.7%This article: 2.9%Jake Roach: 0.4%Tom's Hardware: 1.3%Self-Serving Bias2.9%This article: 2.9%Jake Roach: 0.5%Tom's Hardware: 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error2.9%This article: 0.0%Jake Roach: 0.0%Tom's Hardware: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jake Roach: 0.3%Tom's Hardware: 0.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jake Roach: 0.0%Tom's Hardware: 0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jake Roach: 1.7%Tom's Hardware: 2.8%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jake Roach: 0.0%Tom's Hardware: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jake Roach: 0.0%Tom's Hardware: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 24.3%Jake Roach: 4.0%Tom's Hardware: 2.0%Recency Bias24.3%This article: 0.0%Jake Roach: 0.0%Tom's Hardware: 0.6%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jake Roach: 0.4%Tom's Hardware: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jake Roach: 0.2%Tom's Hardware: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Jake Roach: 0.0%Tom's Hardware: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 4.1%Jake Roach: 2.9%Tom's Hardware: 5.4%Appeal to Authority4.1%This article: 2.5%Jake Roach: 0.9%Tom's Hardware: 2.0%False Dilemma2.5%This article: 0.0%Jake Roach: 0.5%Tom's Hardware: 1.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Jake Roach: 0.0%Tom's Hardware: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 5.6%Jake Roach: 3.6%Tom's Hardware: 6.1%Hasty Generalization5.6%This article: 0.0%Jake Roach: 0.0%Tom's Hardware: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 5.8%Jake Roach: 1.2%Tom's Hardware: 1.1%Bandwagon5.8%This article: 0.0%Jake Roach: 0.0%Tom's Hardware: 3.0%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Jake Roach: 0.0%Tom's Hardware: 0.8%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 23.1%Jake Roach: 2.1%Tom's Hardware: 3.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)23.1%This article: 0.0%Jake Roach: 0.0%Tom's Hardware: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Jake Roach: 0.4%Tom's Hardware: 0.8%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Jake Roach: 0.0%Tom's Hardware: 0.3%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Jake Roach: 0.3%Tom's Hardware: 0.6%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Jake Roach: 0.5%Tom's Hardware: 1.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Jake Roach: 0.0%Tom's Hardware: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 10.5%Jake Roach: 2.9%Tom's Hardware: 3.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)10.5%This article: 0.0%Jake Roach: 0.0%Tom's Hardware: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 2.7%Jake Roach: 0.3%Tom's Hardware: 0.2%Middle Ground2.7%This article: 0.0%Jake Roach: 0.0%Tom's Hardware: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 2.9%Jake Roach: 0.2%Tom's Hardware: 0.2%Special Pleading2.9%This article: 0.0%Jake Roach: 0.4%Tom's Hardware: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 7.8%Jake Roach: 2.4%Tom's Hardware: 2.4%Unattributed Quote7.8%This article: 4.1%Jake Roach: 0.6%Tom's Hardware: 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection4.1%This article: 0.0%Jake Roach: 3.2%Tom's Hardware: 7.1%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Jake Roach: 0.0%Tom's Hardware: 1.3%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Jake Roach: 0.0%Tom's Hardware: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jake Roach: 0.0%Tom's Hardware: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 1.2%Jake Roach: 2.8%Tom's Hardware: 3.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…1.2%

515 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers27%attributed speech377writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageKwak Noh-jung • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageKwak Noh-jung • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageSK Hynix • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageKwan Noh-jung • 21 words • 100.0% coverageKwan Noh-jung • 16 words • 100.0% coverageKwan Noh-jung • 10 words • 0.0% coverageChey Tae-won • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Kwan Noh-jung

100%flagged-word coverage
47 attributed words34% of attributed speech74% writer coverage
0%22.5%45.0%Quote-first Misdirection+44.7 ptsWriter: 0.0%Kwan Noh-jung: 44.7%44.7%Unattributed Quote+34.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Kwan Noh-jung: 34.0%34.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -1.6 ptsWriter: 1.6%Kwan Noh-jung: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.