Speaker summary
93%1 analyzed article/video22 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kurt Vonnegut results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice and Unattributed Quote, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 22 hits. Analysis detected 44 faulty-reasoning hits from 22 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 66.7% and a BS Rank of 79% (6,221 of 28,364 speakers). This Kurt Vonnegut is worse (more manipulative) than 78.10% of the peer group.
Kurt Vonnegut
Speaker details
Total words: 22
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

78% percentile
025507510078.1% percentile
66.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos22 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 5.3%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos