Speaker summary
⁠81%1 analyzed article/video51 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kristen Fountain results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion and Self-Serving Bias, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 70.6% saturation with 48 hits. Analysis detected 101 faulty-reasoning hits from 51 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 54.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (7,692 of 28,364 speakers). This Kristen Fountain is worse (more manipulative) than 72.90% of the peer group.
Kristen Fountain
Speaker details
Total words: 51
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

73% percentile
025507510072.9% percentile
54.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos51 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 70.6%70.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 64.7%64.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 29.4%29.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%In-Group Bias: Speaker 70.6%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 64.7%, sitewide 15.9%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 29.4%, sitewide 3.7%In-Group BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos