Speaker summary
⁠93%2 analyzed articles/videos23.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kremlin results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Tu Quoque and Optimism Bias, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 35 hits. Analysis detected 82 faulty-reasoning hits from 23.5 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠92% (2,344 of 27,843 speakers). This Kremlin is worse (more manipulative) than 91.60% of the peer group.
Kremlin
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 23.5
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

92% percentile
025507510091.6% percentile
100.0% BS Score2 analyzed videos23.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Tu QuoqueSitewide 0.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%In-Group Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.9%Tu Quoque: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.2%Optimism Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos