Speaker summary
⁠75%1 analyzed article/video28 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kira Burns results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Quote-first Misdirection as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 42 hits. Analysis detected 107.625 faulty-reasoning hits from 28 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 68.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠79% (5,969 of 28,364 speakers). This Kira Burns is worse (more manipulative) than 79.00% of the peer group.
Kira Burns
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 28
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

79% percentile
025507510079.0% percentile
68.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos28 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos