Speaker summary
⁠72%1 analyzed article/video111 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kileen Lindgren results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 54.7% saturation with 60.75 hits. Analysis detected 302.75 faulty-reasoning hits from 111 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 31.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠50% (14,230 of 28,364 speakers). This Kileen Lindgren is better (less manipulative) than 50.20% of the peer group.
Kileen Lindgren
Speaker details
Total words: 111
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

50% percentile
025507510049.8% percentile
31.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos111 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 73.0%73.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 54.7%54.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 36.5%36.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 36.5%36.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 13.5%13.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 13.5%13.5%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 13.5%13.5%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 13.5%13.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 73.0%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 54.7%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 36.5%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 36.5%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Speaker 13.5%, sitewide 26.9%Begging the Question: Speaker 13.5%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Speaker 13.5%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Speaker 13.5%, sitewide 0.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos