Speaker summary
⁠78%1 analyzed article/video156 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kiel Lopez-Schmidt results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal and Self-Serving Bias, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 63.4% saturation with 98.927 hits. Analysis detected 199.927 faulty-reasoning hits from 156 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 34.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (13,213 of 28,364 speakers). This Kiel Lopez-Schmidt is worse (more manipulative) than 53.40% of the peer group.
Kiel Lopez-Schmidt
Speaker details
Total words: 156
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

53% percentile
025507510053.4% percentile
34.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos156 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 63.4%63.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 26.8%26.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 14.2%14.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%In-Group Bias: Speaker 63.4%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 26.8%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 14.2%, sitewide 3.7%In-Group BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos