Speaker summary
⁠93%1 analyzed article/video72 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kichimaru results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Anecdotal, with Loss Aversion as the most egregious example at 75% saturation with 54 hits. Analysis detected 294 faulty-reasoning hits from 72 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 62.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠77% (6,733 of 28,364 speakers). This Kichimaru is worse (more manipulative) than 76.30% of the peer group.
Kichimaru
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 72
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

76% percentile
025507510076.3% percentile
62.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos72 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Loss Aversion: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.8%Anecdotal: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 5.2%Burden of Proof: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.4%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos