Speaker summary
⁠93%1 analyzed article/video69 analyzed words
BS Summary: These KGM. results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Composition/Division, and Bandwagon, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 73.9% saturation with 51 hits. Analysis detected 214 faulty-reasoning hits from 69 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 38.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (12,142 of 28,287 speakers). This KGM. is worse (more manipulative) than 57.10% of the peer group.
KGM.
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 69
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

57% percentile
025507510057.1% percentile
38.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos69 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 73.9%73.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 58.0%58.0%Composition/DivisionSitewide 0.2%Speaker 42.0%42.0%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Speaker 31.9%31.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 26.1%26.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 26.1%26.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 26.1%26.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 26.1%26.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Framing Effect: Speaker 73.9%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 58.0%, sitewide 15.9%Composition/Division: Speaker 42.0%, sitewide 0.2%Bandwagon: Speaker 31.9%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 26.1%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 26.1%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 26.1%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 26.1%, sitewide 19.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos