Speaker summary
⁠34%1 analyzed article/video856.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kevin Wright results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Optimism Bias, and Straw Man, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 5.6% saturation with 49 hits. Analysis detected 326.815 faulty-reasoning hits from 856.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠1% (28,136 of 28,364 speakers). This Kevin Wright is better (less manipulative) than 99.20% of the peer group.
Kevin Wright
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠1%Kevin Wright (selected)4%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 856.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

1% percentile
02550751000.8% percentile
3.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos856.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 2.0%2.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 1.7%1.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 1.7%1.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 2.0%2.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 5.7%5.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 2.1%2.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 2.9%2.9%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 4.0%4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 3.8%3.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 4.4%4.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 5.3%Straw Man: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos