Speaker summary
⁠45%1 analyzed article/video76 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kevin Plank results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Begging the Question, and Confirmation Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 114 hits. Analysis detected 258 faulty-reasoning hits from 76 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 37.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠57% (12,422 of 28,364 speakers). This Kevin Plank is worse (more manipulative) than 56.20% of the peer group.
Kevin Plank
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 76
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

56% percentile
025507510056.2% percentile
37.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos76 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 25.4%25.4%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 25.4%25.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 24.6%24.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 25.4%25.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 25.4%25.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Optimism Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.0%Framing Effect: Speaker 25.4%, sitewide 26.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 25.4%, sitewide 0.8%Begging the Question: Speaker 25.4%, sitewide 1.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 25.4%, sitewide 7.5%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 24.6%, sitewide 1.1%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos