Speaker summary
⁠71%1 analyzed article/video62.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kevin J. Reddington results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Actor-Observer Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Availability Heuristic, with Anchoring Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 34 hits. Analysis detected 220 faulty-reasoning hits from 62.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 39.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (11,915 of 28,364 speakers). This Kevin J. Reddington is worse (more manipulative) than 58.00% of the peer group.
Kevin J. Reddington
Speaker details
Total words: 62.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

58% percentile
025507510058.0% percentile
39.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos62.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide 0.6%Speaker 32.7%32.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 32.7%32.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 32.7%32.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 32.7%32.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 32.7%32.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 15.4%15.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 4.0%Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 32.7%, sitewide 0.6%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 32.7%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 32.7%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 32.7%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 32.7%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 15.4%, sitewide 11.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos