Speaker summary
⁠74%2 analyzed articles/videos96.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kevin Hassett results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Appeal to Authority, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 47.7% saturation with 122 hits. Analysis detected 359.273 faulty-reasoning hits from 96.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 23.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠38% (16,522 of 26,607 speakers). This Kevin Hassett is better (less manipulative) than 62.10% of the peer group.
Kevin Hassett

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

38% percentile
025507510037.9% percentile
23.8% BS Score2 analyzed videos96.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 57.0%57.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 47.7%47.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 18.4%18.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 11.3%11.3%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Speaker 11.3%11.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 14.1%14.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 6.6%6.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 57.0%, sitewide 4.0%Optimism Bias: Speaker 47.7%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 18.4%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 14.1%, sitewide 11.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 0.8%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 1.4%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos