Speaker summary
⁠75%1 analyzed article/video50.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kevin Green results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Optimism Bias, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 76 hits. Analysis detected 228 faulty-reasoning hits from 50.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 80% and a BS Rank of ⁠82% (5,163 of 28,364 speakers). This Kevin Green is worse (more manipulative) than 81.80% of the peer group.
Kevin Green
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 50.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

82% percentile
025507510081.8% percentile
80.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos50.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.0%Framing Effect: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 26.9%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos